Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

It appears that SC politicians want to protect government agents from lawsuits while also creating legal loopholes that open up nonprofits such as ours to (further) censorship and punishment for exposing corruption. Of course, they have named this bill the “South Carolina Public Expression Protection Act” to insult your intelligence. Representative Weston Newton authored H.3305 and it has already passed the House. Here are the highlights:

This bill enacts Title 15, Chapter 3, Article 7 regarding a cause of action in civil court based upon a persons communication and establishes requirements for these proceedings.

Definitions Include…Everyone

It defines “person” to encompasses just about anyone that may come against a politician. They include “person” to mean “individual, estate, trust, partnership, business or nonprofit entity, governmental unit, or other legal entity.”

Silencing Critics During ‘Emergencies’ (Updated 1/27/2026)

The bill even has a carve out that would allow critics to be silenced during times of ’emergency.’ It specifically states that once adopted, this law does not apply to a government unit/agent acting in official capacity to “enforce a law to protect against an imminent threat to public health or safety.” COVID anyone??

This is a law that has the potential to strip away US citizens’ God-given First Amendment rights by opening a door to new lawsuits from government authorities in their official capacities to squelch their critics if there is “an imminent threat to public health or safety.”

Update: The day after this article was released, Senator Josh Kimbrell offered and passed an amendment that removed one of the two places in H.3305 that gives exceptions “enforce a law to protect against an imminent threat to public health or safety.” While the bill no longer states as in this section, it still allows the government to file a special motion for expedited relief to dismiss the cause of action if it is seeking “to protect against an imminent threat to public health or safety.”

Supercedes Rule of Law

H.3305 allows motions pursuant to this article to supercede any other pending actions or remedies that are provided in a normal court of law. Some of these superceding actions include staying other legal actions between the plaintiff and respondents and allows the court to hear and rule on (1) motions unrelated, and (2) a motion “seeking a special or preliminary injunction to protect against an imminent threat to public health or safety.”

Loser Pays

What happens if you are involved in this legal action against a SC politician or government agency and lose? H.3305 orders the court shall make the losing side pay for all of the winner’s legal fees.

To learn more about this bill, check out former Rep. Jonathon Hill’s detailed analysis of H.3305, breaking down each section.

Help Us Stop This Bill (Updated 1/27/2026)

H.3305 is currently scheduled for a third vote on the Senate floor. Contact your Senator and ask them to vote AGAINST H.3305.

South Carolinians who expose corruption already have the cards stacked against them. If this bill passes, it guarantees that politicians can insulate themselves even more legally. Remember, your legislators already elect the judges that will be making decisions based off of this law if enacted. If you like what we are doing, please do not allow your legislators to pass H.3305.

Keep Us Going